Registration is now open for the 2019 iNACOL Symposium! Register Now

What Can We Learn From Our Foreign Language Teachers?

December 23, 2013 by

I stumbled upon an article Proficiency-based assessment and personalized learning: What world language educators have known for years that described the process that World Language studies used as they moved toward a competency-based system over the past thirty years.

In 1993, four organizations (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages, the American Association of Teachers of French, the American Association of Teachers of German, and the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese) developed standards for learning foreign languages designed around five themes (Communication, Culture, Connection, Comparison and Communities). Click here for the foreign language standards and proficiency guidelines.

According to the author, embracing standards immediately challenged the notion of grade levels:

The most evident change to the foreign languages standards at that time was replacing grade-level standards with proficiency-level expectations. The proficiency levels are: novice, intermediate, advanced and superior. Additionally, each of these levels (except superior) was further subdivided into low, mid and high. The proficiency levels were defined separately by the ability to listen, speak, read and write in the target language. These new foreign languages standards were framed differently than standards in the past. A Novice Low proficiency level, whether taught to a first grader or a 10th grader, would contain the same standard content — gone were grade-level standards.

Forty states now base their state standards upon this framework. Yet they’ve been operating in the traditional world of Carnegie units and bell-curved grades.  Perhaps we can find leadership and expertise behind the doors of our foreign language classrooms. Perhaps competency-based foreign language teachers in states and districts with enabling policies can now unleash the power of time so that students can reach for higher achievement. Certainly, strong foreign language programs are important for recognizing the assets our ELL students bring to school, helping all of our students  compete for college and jobs, and for our country to navigate globalization.

A final thought — in considering the world language standards, perhaps if we apply competency-based instruction to ELL instruction, we might finally be able to open the door for students to fully access academic literacy across the disciplines. In January, I’ll be writing about how ELL in competency-based schools.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email
share this post:Tweet about this on Twitter
Share on Facebook
Email this to someone


  1. Comment by Rose Colby 5:12 pm, December 23, 2013

    In many of our NH high schools, we use 5 competency statements for World Languages that are based on these “5 C’s” . I’d be happy to send them along to anyone interested:

  2. Comment by Chris Sturgis 5:08 pm, December 28, 2013

    Rose, why dont’ you send me the 5 C’s of World Languages and I can add them here and in the wiki!

  3. Comment by Jim Snyder 9:35 pm, December 30, 2013

    Hi Chris,
    It is nice to see one of my articles cited here. I am excited to see that you will be writing about ELL instruction next month. The intersection between World Languages and ELL instruction is wide but in many school districts there is not to many conversations happening between the disciplines. Both can be driven for competency based models and there is lots of cross learning that can happen.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera